2026 US Professional Services Partner Compensation Survey

2026 US Professional Services Partner Compensation Survey

Professional services faces an inflection point as partner confidence falls amid softer demand, AI disruption, and pressure on pay and operating models. Firms must rethink value delivery to attract and keep top talent.
July 16, 2026

Market context

Confidence among partners at many professional services firms is deteriorating, our most recent survey finds, suggesting that their firms are entering a more uncertain demand environment without having meaningfully reset cost structures or incentives. Nearly two-thirds are not confident in their firm’s performance over the next 12 months, and compensation outcomes are weakening: 34% report lower compensation than expected—double the share who said the same in 2022. This is especially true of small-cap firms: 49% of partners at firms with annual revenue of $1 billion or less reported lower compensation than expected, compared to only 27% at firms with annual revenue of more than $20 billion.

A key driver of this uncertainty is that AI is rapidly reshaping how work is delivered and how the industry is structured. AI is shifting demand and introducing new competitors. Half of partners report using it frequently in client delivery, driving both efficiency gains and the development of new offerings. However, many firms are still using AI in relatively limited ways, while clients increasingly expect more advanced and integrated capabilities. These gaps in delivery expectations are leading to a shift toward higher-value advisory activities and away from traditional junior leverage. This evolution is beginning to misalign with traditional partner economics, including revenue targets, leverage models, and pay structures.

These structural shifts are now putting pressure on compensation. While compensation has held steady on the surface, it remains concentrated in the $1 million–$2 million range, with limited upward movement, while the use of equity or other non-cash compensation declined (from 66% in 2022 to 55% in 2026). One likely driver is the weaker stock performance of many large public IT firms in recent years, which has reduced the perceived value and attractiveness of non-cash compensation. Firms are increasingly relying on cash compensation to retain talent, which is putting pressure on fixed costs at a time when growth expectations are softening.

Meanwhile, performance expectations remain high—and are becoming more concentrated among a smaller group of partners. 44% of partners carry revenue targets above $10 million, and more tenured partners disproportionately capture the highest levels of compensation. This dynamic is widening the gap between top and mid performers, as well as between longer- and shorter-tenured partners, which may be contributing to elevated turnover: 52% of respondents report higher partner turnover than expected. As partners move firms more frequently, many effectively reset their tenure trajectory, creating potential risks around retention, perceived equity, and long-term succession.

The industry appears to be at a meaningful inflection point, as firms balance strategic investment priorities with the need to retain top partner talent. But emerging technologies such as AI and the growing influence of private equity are creating choppy waters for both partners and firms to navigate.

Demographics

Survey respondents overwhelmingly serve as partners at their firm, with nearly half also leading practices. More than three-quarters of respondents are male; however, the share of women has steadily increased, doubling since 2022.
Current role
Additional firm leadership roles
Gender

Tenure

About three-quarters of respondents have been partners for more than five years, but only one-quarter have been in their current role for that long. This is consistent with partner tenure over the last few years.
As partner
At current firm
In current role

Firm type

Management and advisory consulting firms make up the largest share of respondents, followed by strategy consulting firms. Since 2022, market dynamics have shifted: representation from management and advisory firms has grown, while strategy consulting has declined. This trend mirrors broader challenges in the strategy consulting market over the past few years.

About 70% of respondents are at firms with more than $1 billion in revenue, and over one-quarter work at firms backed by private equity investors.
Firm type
Firm revenue
External investor or sponsor

Market expectations

Nearly two-thirds of respondents are not confident in their firm’s performance over the next 12 months, yet 6 out of 10 respondents are confident in their own performance. On top of that, one-third feel that partners at their firm received less delivery support than in the prior year. This may help explain why 52% of respondents report higher partner turnover than expected—a big jump from the 30% who said the same in 2022. This outlook is largely driven by market demand and client spending trends, as well as technological disruption, such as AI and automation.

Notably, organizational culture also emerges as a meaningful factor, with roughly half of respondents citing it as a key influence. It appears to weigh more heavily on negative sentiment than on positive: 62% of those lacking confidence cite organizational culture, engagement, and leadership alignment as key factors, while only 26% of confident partners say their firm’s culture is a reason. While not the most frequently selected factor, culture is one of the few that organizations can directly control; yet many appear to be falling short.
Confidence in performance
Key factors influencing outlook
Key factors by own performance
Key factors by firm’s performance
Partner turnover
Change in delivery support ratio

Artificial intelligence

As seen in similar surveys, a strong majority of respondents use AI, but only 18% do so very frequently. When partners use AI (beyond general-purpose tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude), they report improved automation of research and analysis tasks, accelerated project timelines, new AI-driven offerings, and higher-quality, more consistent deliverables. These efficiency gains also coincide with increased client expectations. As clients recognize that AI enables companies to complete work more quickly, they may see it as their prerogative to ask for more.

Power users—those who use AI tools in client delivery frequently or very frequently—report greater benefits than less frequent users. The most notable difference is a shift from manual execution to advisory work. In fact, 27% of power users say AI has improved client delivery to a large extent, compared with just 5% of occasional users.
Frequency of use
Impact on client delivery
Impact on industry

Stay connected

Stay connected to our expert insights, thought leadership, and event information.

Leadership Podcast

Explore the latest episodes of The Heidrick & Struggles Leadership Podcast.